Sorry, we don't support your browser.  Install a modern browser

A Free Version#25

?

Because the monthly cost is steep (my coffee is cheap).

9 months ago

Free to browse (and maybe comment, but I’m not convinced on that one) would be cool.

9 months ago
3
E

Plenty of people enjoy looking at beautiful images but not posting. A free account would be perfect for this. Could allow comments, following, and favoriting perhaps?

9 months ago
6
Merged Free user tier to view photos only#150
8 months ago
2
?

Free users can post , but not original quality or some features limited …I think

8 months ago
L
  • free App
  • membership as in app purchase
  • several membership levels:
    • free: only looking
    • commenter: cheap
    • full access: full price as of now
8 months ago
?

Why on earth would we want free commenters? That’s the pathway to spam comments, harassment campsigns etc. by having a cost there is significant friction to some of the worst things that happen on social media.

It’s OK if not everyone signs up for this app. It’s not meant to be the next unicorn. The best thing about the app is other people’s photos. If anything it should be cheaper to post photos and more expensive to comment without posting.

7 months ago
7

+1 for a free viewer account. I love looking at photography but I don’t want to pst anything. In my mind a free account should just be for viewing. It should have no way of adding any content (no uploads, no commenting, not part of the “community”)

2 months ago
2

Tiers sound nice. But! If you get to post comments you have to pay.

2 months ago
1
M

Please no! I will pay double the price a month to avoid another instagram filled with fake likes and spam. Let it be.

2 hours ago